Sunday 11 May 2014

East Asia palm oil problems could hit consumers worldwide

JAKARTA, May 11, 2014 (AFP) - Southeast Asia's booming palm oil industry is facing a double blow from a recent drought and a possible El Nino weather phenomenon later this year, with analysts warning a production shortfall could spark a jump in consumer goods prices.

From biscuits to shampoo and make-up, the oil has become a key ingredient in numerous products found on supermarket shelves across the globe, fuelling rapid growth of the industry in the world's top two producers, Indonesia and Malaysia.

But a drought in January and February in the countries, which provide some 85 percent of the world's palm oil and are home to vast plantations where swathes of rainforest used to stand, has raised the prospect of a drop in production later this year.

Dry weather does not have an immediate effect on the fruit, which needs to be deprived of water for some months before any impact is noticeable.

While palm oil prices have risen slightly in recent months in Indonesia, the country's Palm Oil Association put it down to other factors, and industry observers predicted the drought's impact would start to be felt later in 2014.

- Consumer price rises likely -

"We are likely to see the effects starting in September to October, and in terms of production, we are likely to see a double-digit percentage drop in Indonesia and Malaysia," said Tan Chee Tat, a Singapore-based investment analyst at Philip Futures whose work has focused on palm oil.

"There is a high likelihood companies will pass on the price rise to consumers."

Another threat could come hot on the heels of this year's dry weather -- forecasters are predicting an El Nino weather phenomenon later this year, which could spark another drought that will hit production in 2015.

The Australian Bureau of Meteorology issued an El Nino alert this week, warning the likelihood of the weather pattern developing was at least 70 percent, and it could appear as early as July.

This follows recent warnings from other weather agencies there is a good chance of an El Nino.

El Nino, which develops every two to seven years, occurs when water warms around Indonesia, shifts eastwards and rises to the surface in the eastern Pacific.

The warming water changes wind patterns and draws rain and thunderstorms towards South America and away from countries in the western Pacific.

- Billions of dollars in damage -

It typically brings floods to usually arid countries in western South America and drought to Indonesia and other countries in the region.

If this year's El Nino is as strong as the 20th century's worst in 1997-98, which was blamed for tens of thousands of deaths and billions of dollars in damage, it could wreak havoc on palm oil crops, analysts fear.

Fadhil Hasan, executive director of the Indonesian Palm Oil Association, said that production was hit in 2008 following an El Nino, and prices rose to $1,200 a tonne. They are currently at around $930 a tonne.

However he said that other factors, such as market speculation, may have also contributed to the rise.

Alan Lim, a palm oil plantation analyst from Kenanga Investment Bank in Malaysia, said that "in the worst case scenario" an El Nino could cause a 30 percent dip in production in the top two producers.

He said production would be hit some six to 12 months after El Nino, meaning in 2015.

Observers also warn a steep rise in palm oil prices could boost alternative products, especially soybean oil, which is mainly grown in the United States and Brazil.

Despite the growing concerns, some industry players and analysts downplayed the dangers and were optimistic that palm oil would stay ahead of its competitors even during a sustained period of drought.


It is the highest-yielding vegetable oil crop and needs less than half the land required by other crops, such as soybean, according to the Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil, an organisation established to promote sustainable use and growth of the commodity.

This makes palm oil, extracted from a cherry-sized fruit that grows in bunches on trees, the cheapest vegetable oil in the world.

Indonesia's climate agency also played down the possibility an El Nino would hit the country's main plantation areas, on western Sumatra island and the country's portion of Borneo island.

A greater source of pressure on the industry may remain sustained campaigns from green groups, who are calling for palm oil to be produced in a sustainable fashion that does not destroy any more rainforest.

"The question is not whether more or less palm oil is produced, but how it is produced," said Bustar Maitar, head of the Indonesia Forest Campaign at Greenpeace International.

"Its production must not destroy forests, drain peatlands or contribute to the very forest fires that are pumping carbon into the atmosphere and across the region," he added, referring to blazes that are regularly set to clear land for plantations.

www.lbo.lk

John Keells Holdings integrated resort starts raising foreign debt

May 11, 2014 (LBO) - Sri Lanka's Waterfront Properties (Pvt) Ltd, a unit of John Keells Holdings that is building an integrated resort has started raising foreign debt with Standard Chartered being appointed advisor.

Standard Chartered Bank had given the first 100 million US dollars, as bridging finance for the first phase of the project, the lender said in an announcement this week.

A larger volume of medium term finance within the next 12 months, with which the bridge loan will also be settled, Colin Pawley, Head, Corporate and Institutional Clients at Standard Chartered, Sri Lanka said.

The exact volume of medium term finance which could be through a syndicated loan would be decided later.

Waterfront Properties, which involves a high end hotel, shopping mall, entertainment, commercial space and apartments, has an estimated investment of 650 million US dollars for the first stage going up to 850 million US dollars at completion.

Its parent, John Keells Holding has already raised equity by a cash call on local and foreign investors.

The project is the single largest started by a private Sri Lankan firm.

Sri Lanka's Dialog Axiata March net down 21-pct

May 10, 2014 (LBO) - Profits at Dialog Axiata, Sri Lanka's largest mobile operator fell 21 percent from a year earlier to 1.25 billion rupees in the March 2014 quarter, amid a rise in expenses, interim accounts showed.

The group which also has interests in fixed access and pay television reported earnings of 15.9 cents for the quarter. The stock closed at 9.40 rupees Friday.

Group revenues rose 7 percent to 16.3 billion rupees but expenses rose at a faster 17 percent to 9.8 billion rupees shrinking gross profits 4.9 percent to 6.5 billion rupees.

The company said depreciation charges were higher by 176 million rupees.

Its mobile revenues rose to 14.18 billion rupees from 13.3 billion rupees a year earlier, but were slightly down from the December quarter's 14.24 billion rupees. The firm had 9.3 million subscribers by end March 2014.

Dialog Broadband, which is the fixed access and broadband unit had stable revenues of 1.5 billion rupees, the firm said. It lost 311 million rupees in the quarter up from 62 million rupees a year earlier.

The firm said higher depreciation charges from 4G (fourth generation) relative investments had hurt profits.

Its pay television services made a profit of 132 million rupees, compared to a loss of 14 million rupees a year earlier.

Govt. now says: Packer can have casino

By Mario Andree
Ceylon FT: Contradicting President Mahinda Rajapaksa and Minister of Economic Development Basil Rajapaksa's statements, government spokesman Keheliya Rambukwella said that Australian billionaire and gaming tycoon James Packer would be able to operate a casino in his Sri Lankan investment of US$ 400 million, as a result of restricting casino operations in the country to D. R. Wijewardena Mawatha.

Uncertainty loomed as to whether Australian gaming tycoon James Packer would go ahead with his Sri Lankan investment, when the government decided to not allow a casino, and his local partner said he was 'simply fed up'. However the new move has been encouraging for Packer and Wijerathne.

Refusing to comment on the authorized body to issue casino licence, he said that the Australian gaming tycoon or any investor would be able to operate a casino in projects through a joint venture with a local licence holder.


According to officials there were five casino licences in Sri Lanka held by two businessmen. Local gaming mogul Dhammika Perera owns three, and Rank Holdings Chairman currently holds two. The government has made it clear that it will not be issuing new licences.

The new update was contradicting various statements made by leading government officials, including President Mahinda Rajapaksa, Economic Development Minister Basil Rajapaksa and Minister of Investment Promotion Lakshman Yapa Abeywardena.

Australian billionaire and gaming tycoon James Packer entered Sri Lanka mid last year to invest US$ 400 million on two acres of land at D. R. Wijewardena Mawatha, partnering Sri Lanka's Rank Holdings headed by Ravi Wijerathne.


The project and two other local blue chips, John Keells Holdings and local gaming mogul Dhammika Perera's, came under serious criticism following gazette notifications which mentioned that the first two projects approved by cabinet included casinos.

Later the Ministry of Investment Promotion amended the gazettes excluding the casino and concessions for such activity, and replacing it with 'Associated Facilities' which words raised suspicions as they were ambiguous.


According to Rambukwella's statement all the five casinos will have to shift their operations to D. R. Wijewardena Mawatha since it would be restricted to the area.

Local gaming mogul Dhammika Perera will also be able to operate a casino in his upcoming project, Queensbury, as already one of his casinos was located at D. R. Wijewardena Mawatha. The other two casinos, MGM and Bellagio too will have to relocate to D. R. Wijewardena Mawatha.

However, local blue chip John Keells Holdings which too entered into an agreement following Packer's proposal to construct an integrated casino resort, according to the new move will not be able to operate such activity.

The projects were opposed by the main opposition and others who believed that the casinos being included in the projects would promote prostitution and damage the Sri Lankan culture.

When the three projects were approved by parliament, both President Mahinda Rajapaksa and Economic Development Minister Basil Rajapaksa said they would not allow casinos.
www.ceylontoday.lk

AIA Insurance Lanka profits up 145%

Ceylon FT: AIA Insurance Lanka PLC reported a net profit of Rs 78 million for the quarter ended 31 March 2014, up 145% from a year ago, the company said announcing results for the first quarter of the 2014 financial year.

"The company reported consolidated revenue of Rs 3,212 million for the three months ended 31 March 2014. Gross Written Premium (GWP) income of the composite business grew by 6% compared with the first quarter of 2013 to Rs 2,595 million. Overall life business reported a GWP of Rs 1,755 million for the first quarter of 2014. Conventional life products contributed 76% of the overall life business GWP, representing a strong growth of 20% compared with the corresponding quarter in 2013. General insurance reported a GWP of Rs 840 million for the first quarter of 2014," the company said in a statement.

The main contributor to the increase in profits is the reduction of expenses, it said.

"Expenses for the same period in 2013 were higher due to brand migration and integration related expenditure as previously disclosed. Profit reported excludes the surplus from the long-term insurance business, which is determined annually by the year-end actuarial valuation and will be included in the full year results for the financial year ending December 2014."

Gordon Watson, Chairman of AIA Sri Lanka, commented on the results, "I am pleased that AIA Sri Lanka has delivered a positive start to 2014 after completing a strong first year as part of the AIA Group, the leading pan-Asian life insurer. The first quarter results reflect the strong execution by the management team and reinforce our confidence in the potential of our business in Sri Lanka."

Shah Rouf, Chief Executive Officer, said, "The first quarter results have provided us with a strong foundation to build on for the rest of the year. We look forward to maintaining our momentum through the successful execution of our strategic priorities for 2014".
www.ceylontoday.lk

EPF track record exemplary and commendable

By Nihal Rodrigo

The Employees’ Provident Fund (EPF) has been earning above-average profits in the recent past, but unfortunately, there have been grossly unfair criticisms and outrageous allegations made by certain parties against the EPF. Therefore a detailed analysis seems to be warranted.

The EPF is, by far, the biggest profit earning entity in the country. For instance, during the last five year period from 2009 -2013, the EPF has earned a total profit of Rs.558 billion! There is no other entity with a comparable asset base earning such an enormous profit in the country. In absolute terms, EPF has made profits of Rs.101.7 billion in 2009, Rs.111.5 billion in 2010, Rs.107.5 billion in 2011, Rs.111.8 billion in 2012 and Rs.125.6 billion in the year 2013.

Further, as far as rates of returns are concerned, EPF has been able to declare impressive rates of return of 13.75 percent in 2009, 12.5 percent in 2010, 11.5 percent in 2011, 11.5 percent in 2012 and 11 percent in 2013 out of profits earned by the Fund. Such rates of return were substantially above the interest rates applicable to normal deposits in the financial market during the respective periods. In that background, it is clear that the allegations against the EPF are baseless, and are obviously motivated by dubious intentions.

Some persons have specifically claimed that the EPF has incurred losses amounting to over Rs.11 billion in 2011 from the investments that it has made in the stock market. There is absolutely no truth in such a claim and that is an erroneous and misleading allegation, since the “losses” that these claims have highlighted are not realized losses, but unrealized reductions in value of investments.

In actual fact, EPF has not incurred any realized losses at all in its stock market operations, but has earned realized gains in the amounts of Rs.714 million in 2011, Rs.1,020 million in 2012 and Rs.113 million in 2013.

As persons knowledgeable in stock market operations very well know, when a person invests in the stock market or in the equity of corporates, the stock prices may move up and down from time to time. In fact, it is an inherent feature of any market. Hence, if shares purchased in the past are revalued at a time when market prices have declined, there would be a fall in the value of the investment. But it is not an actual loss. An actual loss would materialize only if those shares are sold at such depressed prices. If shares are not disposed at the reduced prices, the reduction in value arising from such revaluations is described as “unrealized losses”. At the same time, if shares purchased in the past are revalued at a time when market prices have increased, there would be a gain in the value of the investments. But that too, is not an actual profit. An actual profit would be earned and realized, only if those shares are sold at such increased prices. If shares are not disposed at the increased prices, the increase in value arising from such revaluations is described as “unrealized gains”.

Long-term focus
The EPF invests in the stock market with a long- term focus, and not with a short-term perspective. Therefore, unrealized gains or losses arising from short-term fluctuations in prices do not affect the profits of EPF. The reason for this outcome is that the EPF does not have any financial difficulties nor does it have any urgency to sell any shares at a loss. 


This is because of the fact that EPF has more than adequate funds to meet its day-to-day obligations and to make refunds to members and other payments, and its average daily inflows are far greater than that of its average daily outflows. What are invested are the excess funds remaining after meeting all obligations. Therefore, the EPF will not need to sell its investments at a loss to raise funds for its daily operations.

It must also be noted that the amount of unrealized gains and losses changes from time to time. For instance, the net unrealized gain as at December 31, 2010 was nearly Rs.18 billion. However, at such time, today’s vociferous political critics were deafeningly silent and did not acknowledge the massive unrealized gains appearing in the books of the EPF.

Further, just because the EPF had such large unrealized gains at that time, it did not sell all its investments to realize the gains, because EPF is a long-term investor. It is only if the investment managers of the EPF are satisfied that the unrealized gains are substantial, and they believe it is the right time to sell, that they sell such shares and realize the profits.

With the downturn in the share market, the net unrealized gain of nearly Rs.18 billion at the end 2010, gradually moved into negative territory, and turned into a net unrealized loss of about Rs.9 billion by the end of 2013. However, by April 22, 2014, the net unrealized loss had reduced to about Rs.4.4 billion, and by May 2, 2014, it has come down further to about Rs.2.9 billion! Hence, it would be seen that since of late, with the recent upturn in the stock market, it is likely that the net “unrealized loss” that have been made use of by some persons to discredit the EPF, will turn into a net unrealized gain in the near future, thus causing deep embarrassment to these elements.

It must also be clearly understood that these unrealized losses do not affect the returns paid to members. In fact, when there were large net unrealized gains, it did not result in an additional return being credited to the members. In the same way, when there are net unrealized losses, it will not adversely affect the returns to be credited to the members. 

Only actual realized gains or realized losses are considered when arriving at profits or losses of the EPF.

Investing in stock market
Another claim that is sometimes made is that if EPF had not invested in the stock market, it would not have been subjected to this sort of losses. In that regard, it must be stated, that these claims too, are without a rational basis. The stock market is an alternative avenue available for investment, in addition to government securities. When investors invest in the stock market, they always do so on the basis that diversification is a fundamental principle of portfolio management. That means investing in different types of assets and not “putting all their eggs in one basket”. There is a high risk if a person invests only in one or two assets or asset classes. That is known to every investor. It must also be noted, that with the fiscal consolidation planned by the government where the budget deficits are being reduced gradually to below 4% of GDP, the need for government borrowings are also gradually reducing. As a result, the EPF has to find new investment avenues to invest its funds. This is another reason for the EPF to explore new investment avenues. Not only for the EPF, but for all pension funds from all over the world, stocks are a major asset class for investment purpose. Therefore, because of some politically motivated allegations and criticisms, if the EPF refrains from diversifying into different asset classes, the risks could be much greater in the future for its members, and that would be detrimental in the long term.

Selection of stock investments
Another criticism that has been leveled against the EPF is that its investment activities have been carried out arbitrarily and have been not in line with best investment practices. In this connection, it must be stated that in terms of the provisions of the EPF Act, the Commissioner of Labour is vested with the decisions pertaining to the administration of the Fund, while the Monetary Board of the Central Bank of Sri Lanka, as the custodian of the Fund, is empowered to make decisions relating to investment activities. Accordingly, the investments are made, based on a set of guidelines and policies, which are from time to time, updated and approved by the Monetary Board. 


Accordingly, the Fund has a set of rules, guidelines and an organizational structure to undertake investment activities. Thus, there is no room for making arbitrary investments since there is laid down procedure for making all investments, as well as conducting the investment operations of the Fund. For instance, new investments/ proposals/observations made by fund managers have to be submitted to the Investment Committee (IC) appointed by the Monetary Board for evaluation and analyses. The responsibility of the IC is to make its recommendations to the Monetary Board. Thereafter, having considered the recommendations, the Monetary Board, makes a final decision on such investments. 

Moreover, prior approval is obtained from the Monetary Board for the expected investment plan for the following month. It should also be noted that investment activities of the Fund are performed by a team of well-trained officers who possess the required educational and professional qualifications in the respective fields. At the same time, the EPF takes many factors into consideration when stock market investments are carried out. 

These include the intrinsic value of stocks and their future prospects, possible rise in value of stocks in the medium to long term, organizational structures and future plans of companies, the number of stocks in issue of such companies, viability and growth potential of the relevant industry, and possible impact of the emerging economic activities on the company.

Financial statements
In the recent past, there have also been allegations that the EPF financial statements have not prepared and issued in time. This claim is also not correct. The EPF has prepared all its financial statements of every year in time, and submitted such financial statements to the Auditor-General and the Minister of Labour within the first two months, and three months respectively, of the following year. The highlights of the financial statements have also been published in newspapers within the first six months of the following year.

Accordingly, the financial statements for years up to 2013 have already been submitted to the Auditor-General. Once the Auditor General hands over the audited financial statements after completing the audit of such statements, those are submitted to the Minister of Labour to be tabled in the Parliament. The process of submitting financial statements to Parliament may sometimes take a longer time than anticipated due to the legislature procedures. However, it must also be stated that all members of the Fund have received their member balances within six months of the end of the year, and on that basis if, as alleged, the financial statements were not prepared on time, the Fund would not have been able to send half yearly individual statements to all its active members.

Another matter that has to be highlighted is that the EPF has been able to maintain its operational costs at less than 1 percent of the Fund value, which is by far, one of the lowest cost ratios in the world! In fact, in 2013, this was only 0.9 percent. This is a very good outcome in comparison to the costs incurred by similar funds in other parts of the world! Generally, a management fee of about a 2 to 3 percent is charged by private fund managers, for the management of a Fund, but the EPF has managed its funds at less than 1 percent, even while out-performing the others, and distributing those benefits amongst its members.

Returns from EPF Fund
Further, when one is referring to the returns of the fund, the total returns of the fund must be considered, without dissecting the individual items in a large portfolio, on a selective or piece-meal basis. In that context, it must be appreciated that what matters in the final analysis is as to whether EPF was able to earn a high rate of return for its members, relative to such other similar funds. Accordingly, it is abundantly clear that the trust placed in the Monetary Board of the Central Bank by the EPF Act has been well-founded in the past, and will be preserved in the future too.

It must also be stated that a Fundamental Rights action was filed against the EPF in 2012 by several politically motivated persons and others, alleging impropriety relating to EPF’s investments in the stock market. But, as is well known, after a preliminary hearing, the Supreme Court dismissed the petition without even granting leave to proceed. In that background, the EPF wishes to inform the public, and especially its members, that these vituperative and well-planned allegations and actions against the EPF are without foundation, and therefore the members must not to be misled by these politically motivated claims. At the same time, it must be further stated that instead of leveling criticisms against EPF, it should be commended for being able to earn a consistently high rate of return for its members.

(This article by the Superintendent of EPF was sent to us by a Deputy Governor of The Central Bank of Sri Lanka with a view to address concerns raised by media reports recently)
www.nation.lk